[162189] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: route for linx.net in Level3?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Vitkovsky)
Fri Apr 5 03:33:07 2013
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
To: 'Leo Bicknell' <bicknell@ufp.org>, 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130405012657.GA65513@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:32:52 +0200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> The older school of thought was to put all of the edge interfaces into the
IGP, and then carry all of the external routes in BGP.
I thought people where doing it because IGP converged faster than iBGP and
in case of an external link failure the ingress PE was informed via IGP that
it has to find an alternate next-hop.
Though now with the advent of BGP PIC this is not an argument anymore.
adam
