[162168] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Apr 4 11:17:53 2013
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:18:34 +0200."
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1304040616500.23668@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:16:10 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1365088570_3327P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:18:34 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
> I have pitched the idea in the IETF to have TCP stacks themselves report
> IP performance indicators (aggregate) and that a standard for this to be
> standardised. No takers so far.
RFC4989 TCP Extended Statistics MIB. M. Mathis, J. Heffner, R.
Raghunarayan. May 2007. (Format: TXT=153768 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
STANDARD)
Looks like a taker to me. Also, see the work the Web10G group is doing for
Linux: http://www.web10g.org
--==_Exmh_1365088570_3327P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=1F9h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1365088570_3327P--