[162156] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Thu Apr 4 00:15:20 2013
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:14:52 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>,
Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <we7dqr3gi43yngkq8ymvfiit.1365027524628@email.android.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/3/13 3:20 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
> Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency.
on linux
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 900ms 150msdistribution normal
and then you can slowly test the internet to your hearts content.
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
> Date: 04/03/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
>
>
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 22:48, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> (If anybody's got evidence of it reporting more than the link is technically
>> capable of, feel free to correct me...)
> I've seen speedtest.net give results significantly greater than the physical bw of the client's network link.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
