[162139] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Wed Apr 3 18:20:20 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu"
<Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 22:20:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <98EBD33E-46B1-4B6A-9459-99800BFFBCBA@foobar.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency.
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Date: 04/03/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
On 3 Apr 2013, at 22:48, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> (If anybody's got evidence of it reporting more than the link is technica=
lly
> capable of, feel free to correct me...)
I've seen speedtest.net give results significantly greater than the physica=
l bw of the client's network link.
Nick
