[162093] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: RFC 1149

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Apr 2 08:56:03 2013

From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAK__KzszTVyGLKhJNP9GHSVc0wm5EPGHova=9F16O2BrSPxZqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 08:55:46 -0400
To: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:37 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Packets, shmackets.  I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers
> routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet.
> 
> Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't
> deliver packets without proper routing updates!  Knock it off long enough
> for me to converge the #@$#$@ routing table...

I'm working to make our network comply with the latest standards in rfc6919

- Jared


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post