[162082] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC 1149
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Adler)
Mon Apr 1 22:15:37 2013
In-Reply-To: <001801ce2f3b$0161b6c0$04252440$@net>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:15:25 -0400
From: Eric Adler <eaptech@gmail.com>
To: Ed Schweitzer <eschwei@comcast.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and make sure
that you're ready to implement RFC 6214). You'll be highly satisfied with
the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the higher
quality classes).
I'd also suggest a RFC 2322 compliant DHCP server for devices inside the
hurricane zone, but modified by implementing zip ties such that the C47s
aren't released under heavy (wind or water) loads.
- Eric
