[162080] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Apr 1 22:05:53 2013
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANQy6FZmFfOTMXawgAM+xm9gb0Hs4TViK=k1-MLnhPJoD7uzSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:58:22 -0700
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't
> seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure. :-)
>=20
The FCC doesn't understand that 4Mbps customer-facing speed on the tail =
circuit alone does NOT define broadband in a meaningful way.
The SEC does not understand that IPv4 risk and the lack of an IPv6 =
strategy should be a required risk consideration in a Sarbanes Oxley =
filing.
I have little hope that these particular federal agencies will ever =
agree with me about such nuanced issues.
Owen
