[162063] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Mon Apr 1 19:14:26 2013
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:14:13 +0200
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20130401202142.GU55976@burnout.tpb.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Open Resolver Problems Date: Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:21:42PM +=
0200 Quoting Niels Bakker (niels=3Dnanog@bakker.net):
> * patrick@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore) [Mon 01 Apr 2013, 18:18 CEST]:
> >Of course, since users shouldn't be using off-net name servers
> >anyway, this isn't really a problem! :)
>=20
> You're joking, right? Should they also use only the telco-approved
> search engine, via the telco-hosted portal?
Far too many (perhaps not Patrick) in this thread are not joking. Laughter
gets stuck in my throat, as we say in Sweden. Having proper Internet
access is more and more a privilege for the Internet gentry that are
clued and able to pay for a box in a colo or similar.
The unwashed masses are left with "broadband" We can't call it "Internet"
because there are a few raving graybeards that claim they invented it
and intended it to be two-way instead of stuffing .flv down peoples
facebook-viewing devices while also supplanting cable TV with demand=20
streaming.
</rant>
What percentage of the SOHO NAT boxes actually are full-service
resolvers? I was under the impression that most were mere forwarders; just
pushing queries on toward the DHCP'd full service resolvers of the ISP.
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Everywhere I look I see NEGATIVITY and ASPHALT ...
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlFaFMUACgkQ02/pMZDM1cVTxQCeL31rwPgqTxVdKk6RoiXkRAO0
MzYAniblSx3gX/ss3/JruPqPuWhQn3OI
=hfup
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
