[162047] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Finch)
Mon Apr 1 14:45:35 2013
In-Reply-To: <27AC6071-0CF2-491F-9B8F-0E04C732A6C2@puck.nether.net>
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:40:03 +0100
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1 Apr 2013, at 14:44, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>=20
>> Anybody who is looking at this as an IPv4 issue is woefully misinformed
>> about the nature of the problem.
>=20
> :)
>=20
> IPv4 it's easy to collect an inventory (the math works). IPv6, not nearly=
as easy.
You should be able to get a reasonable sample of IPv6 resolvers from the que=
ry logs of a popular authoritative server.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/=
