[162042] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Apr 1 14:28:47 2013
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:19:16 -0400."
<1452969.462.1364840356835.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:27:56 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1364840875_1884P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:19:16 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
> So, how would Patrick's caveat affect me, whose recursive resolver *is
> on my Linux laptop*? Would not that recursor be making queries he
> advocates blocking?
You're sending queries, not replies. That's why DPI is needed to do the
blocking, rather than just by port.
--==_Exmh_1364840875_1884P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=Ocgj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1364840875_1884P--
