|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <20130330030415.GS14491@haller.ws> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:51:58 -0430 From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> To: Patrick <nanog@haller.ws> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Hi, On 3/29/13, Patrick <nanog@haller.ws> wrote: > On 2013-03-29 14:49, William Herrin wrote: >> I've long thought router vendors should introduce a configuration >> option to specify the IP address from which ICMP errors are emitted >> rather than taking the interface address from which the packet causing >> the error was received. > > Concur. An 'ip(v6)? icmp source-interface loop0' sure beats running 'ip > unnumbered loop0' everywhere. ;) Why do you think it will be better?, can you explain? So far I can only think in a more difficult troubleshooting if this idea/feature gets spread. I guess based in the scenario where the output interface can not reach Internet sounds as a practical solution however for sure the output interface is reachable inside the provider network. Thks, Alejandro, >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |