|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:29:04 -0400 From: Harry Hoffman <hhoffman@ip-solutions.net> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <39905.1364476982@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org It's interesting, this just came up on gizmodo. As I said in another forum, take it for what it's worth: http://gizmodo.com/5992652/that-internet-war-apocalypse-is-a-lie Cheers, Harry On 03/28/2013 09:23 AM, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > So we all have heard the breathless news reports of how the recent > urinating contest between Spamhaus and a butthurt ISP was the "biggest > in history". > > Where would you guys put it, if measured as "percent of total worldwide > available Internet bandwidth/resources"? My gut feeling is that by that > metric, it didn't even make the top 20. Think back to the Morris worm, or > Blaster/Nachi/etc - *nobody* had any free bandwidth when those happened. And > even if you restrict the discussion to intentional targeted attacks, I'm sure > we've had worse (Smurf, anybody? :) >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |