[161893] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Mar 27 20:18:15 2013
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:59:16 -0500."
<51536BB4.5070101@brightok.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:16:57 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1364429817_2016P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:59:16 -0500, Jack Bates said:
> On 3/27/2013 4:49 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> > Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> wrote:
> >
> >> 3) BCP38 (in spirit)
> > That should be deployed as well as RRL.
> >
> > Tony.
>
> If BCP38 was properly deployed, what would be the purpose of RRL outside
> of misbehaving clients or direct attacks against that one server?
It would be quite sufficient just for the misbehaving clients aspect.
--==_Exmh_1364429817_2016P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=KZZ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1364429817_2016P--
