[161886] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Finch)
Wed Mar 27 18:52:12 2013
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:51:53 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <51536BB4.5070101@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> wrote:
>
> If BCP38 was properly deployed, what would be the purpose of RRL outside of
> misbehaving clients or direct attacks against that one server?
If fictional scenario, irrelevant answer. Given the current situation,
efforts to deploy both RRL and BCP38 in parallel will reduce the mess we
are in. Let's race to see who gets to full deployment first.
> The infrastructure to switch it to TCP is prohibitive and completely
> destroys the anycast mechanisms.
Yeah, anycast for HTTP doesn't work at all. Just ask CloudFlare.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.
