[161849] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Mar 27 14:52:10 2013
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500."
<51531587.2080101@brightok.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:45:31 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1364409931_2016P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500, Jack Bates said:
> They are not, and I can think of quite a few people who would stare
> blankly at you for making such a statement. Of course, I can think of
> plenty of people who we'd like to see implementing BCP38 concepts that
> would need you to define ingress and egress.
Of course, the fact they don't understand ingress and egress are *totally*
unrelated to the fact they can't figure out how to deploy BCP38, correct?
--==_Exmh_1364409931_2016P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=QjKt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1364409931_2016P--
