[161785] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Resolver Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Mar 26 22:28:49 2013
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:13:43 -0700."
<EE6E748A-1FE0-47B4-851D-463D51BCF632@puck.nether.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:23:05 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1364350985_1861P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:13:43 -0700, Jared Mauch said:
> If you give the same answer 15x to the same person in a few seconds one can
> possibly infer they aren't a caching resolver or are broken. Either way you can
> think about ignoring them for a few with dampening or similar.
So what you're saying is that a decade after Duane Wessels presented
at NANOG saying that 98% of the traffic hitting the root nameservers
was total bull, we're not doing much better?
--==_Exmh_1364350985_1861P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=o8ha
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1364350985_1861P--
