[161682] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Mar 25 11:14:19 2013
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:28:07 -0700."
<AF7138FB-A90C-440D-AFD3-42D1E4209EA2@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:13:03 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1364224382_2609P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:28:07 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
> A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without
> a known solution.
Agreed.
> An idiot-proof simple BGP configuration is a well known solution. Automating
> it would be relatively simple if there were the will to do so.
As others pointed out, a reliable cost effective way of automating the layer
8 problems is *also* a hard problem without a known solution.
--==_Exmh_1364224382_2609P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=6gDF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1364224382_2609P--
