[161590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: routing table go boom
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brielle Bruns)
Wed Mar 20 14:05:03 2013
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:04:34 -0600
From: Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5149F23C.20804@tiedyenetworks.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/20/13 11:30 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>
> I appreciate everyones comments on this issue but I think you
> nay-sayers are going to lose. I think the future of the internet is
> distributed routing where the end points ultimately decide how their
> packets flow. I think joe 6-pack should in fact be able to be connected
> to as many providers as he wants, should be able to specify any mixture
> of connections from consumer dsl to carrier ethernet or beyond, and have
> the same level of service as multi-homed bgp speaking networks do today
> in terms of route diversity, fail-over and 'portability' (in terms of
> bringing your netblocks to another provider). Not a troll, just looking
> at the future here.
>
Why did I just suddenly have a flashback to this?
https://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/2003-10/msg01440.html
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
