|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> In-Reply-To: <5146AA62.40205@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:26:24 +0100 To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Hi, > First of all, multihomed sites with its own global routing > table entries bloats the global routing table, which is the > major cause of global routing table bloat and is not acceptable. Sorry, but that is false. Looking at the CIDR report = (http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Gains) the routing table could shrink = from 449k to 258k just by aggregating announcements. That's a reduction = of 42.5%. I can't see how multihomed end-site announcements can be worst = than that... There would almost be no routing table left ;-) Anyway... Drifting off-topic for this thread. Sander
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |