[161439] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (oscar.vives@gmail.com)
Wed Mar 13 12:22:40 2013
In-Reply-To: <yoobqvh1sriryegaftqa5qyb.1361343883740@email.android.com>
From: " ." <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:21:51 +0100
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 20 February 2013 08:04, Warren Bailey
<wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> An Internet kill switch is a nightmare. We can't even figure out how to r=
un a relay radio system for national emergencies.. Now we are going to assu=
me the people who were owned can somehow shut off communications?
>
> We as Americans have plenty of things we have done halfass.. I hope an In=
ternet kill switch doesn't end up being one of them. Build your own private=
networks, you can't get rooted if someone can't knock. Simple as that.
>
He!, we share the internet with america. If you guys decide to build
and use a internet kill switch, just nuke your part of the internet.
People outside USA are happy with the internet, and we need it :D
just don't use code 666 on the keypad :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DEd6Yr81jZ6g
I know theres a lot of it, and If suddenly tomorrow a enormeous solar
flare kill every electronic in the america continent, we will have
problems here in europe. I just want to make sure you guys know that
we want our part of the internet to continue, even if you guys decide
to pull the plug.
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
