[161429] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jamie Bowden)
Wed Mar 13 08:12:07 2013
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com>
To: Mike A <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:11:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20130312220155.GA81374@mikea.ath.cx>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From: Mike A [mailto:mikea@mikea.ath.cx]
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:41:42PM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
> > Not to mention, the KG units are dot government only.. For obvious
> reasons.
> Erm ... yesandno. Lots of defense contractors have one end of a secured
> circuit. Been there, installed-and-maintained them.
They don't belong to us, they're in a secured area inside a secured area (y=
es, I typed that twice on purpose), and they are regularly inspected by whi=
chever bit of the fed loaned them to us. It's in our facility only as long=
as the circuit it's servicing exists.
Jamie
