[161395] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: traffic accounting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Mar 12 10:34:21 2013
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:25:29 -0400."
<7B1CA142-748B-48C1-8530-69154DA89ED3@hopcount.ca>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:32:22 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org \(nanog@nanog.org\)" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1363098742_1710P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:25:29 -0400, Joe Abley said:
> Imagine you have a number of GE and 10GE interfaces spread across multiple
> MX-class Juniper routers, and for each interface you want to maintain an
> accurate count of bytes sent, categorised by destination address.
An important question that may impact possible solutions - exactly how
accurate does it have to be?
--==_Exmh_1363098742_1710P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=InC+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1363098742_1710P--
