[161328] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Intermapper vs NetBrain vs some other for NMS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Barak)
Fri Mar 8 11:50:59 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAOvEG7M6RUypWJx0DNBy6+=jR_8NA4p5o=1sed4NsbBad=c1AQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:49:14 -0800
To: Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I like intermapper for monitoring: it's been very stable, and exports traps a=
nd notifications well. I also like netbrain for troubleshooting and mapmaki=
ng, because its visualization is engineer and manager-friendly.
David Barak
Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection and top posting.
On Mar 8, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all:
>=20
> I'm looking for information anyone might have comparing Intermapper to
> NetBrain for NMS. Stuff like devices up/down, interface utilization,
> building maps for documentation, etc. IMO, Intermapper works great, when
> it works. Tech support has been slow and often cannot fix the problems,
> not to mention they release updates about once every other week.
>=20
> Anyone familiar with any similar products? We are presently evaluating
> NetBrain and it seems really nice. We really like the Visio-like aspect o=
f
> it.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> -Ben
