[161318] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Comcast NOC Contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vinod K)
Thu Mar 7 14:52:46 2013
From: Vinod K <vinod408@hotmail.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:52:30 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CALgc3C4yZNJKpo6WTScJP3h+W5U9ewdp=ViSsmhBA93AXNeJ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Eugen and NANOG I'm sorry. My earlier comment was from conversation my las=
t employer had about peering with Comcast where they told us they had balan=
ced ratios. You can see from Ren Provo that is no longer true. This is po=
litics as usual=2C playing the silly game. I am sorry to offend. I wish t=
hey work things out with Google so Youtube will stop buffering.
Regards
Vinod
> Date: Thu=2C 7 Mar 2013 17:16:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: Comcast NOC Contact
> From: eugen@imacandi.net
> To: nanog@nanog.org
>=20
> My comment was more or less directed to the person that said "losts of
> people want to send traffic to comcast=2C but no one wants to send money"=
. I
> find it very dangerous and provocative=2C and somewhat on the same line w=
ith
> others that believe in the "sender party pays" crap they're trying to for=
ce
> onto the market.
>=20
>=20
> On Thu=2C Mar 7=2C 2013 at 4:13 PM=2C Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com> wro=
te:
>=20
> > > From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eugen@imacandi.net]
> >
> >
> > > Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whateve=
r
> > > they
> > > want from other networks. With that money=2C Comcast should invest in
> > > infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't t=
his
> > > how IPSs work ? :)
> >
> > In competitive markets=2C that's the theory. That would require one to=
test
> > with...
> >
> > Jamie
> >
=
