[161164] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Good transit provider @Hutchison Cavendish Centre
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Paseka)
Thu Feb 28 01:52:48 2013
In-Reply-To: <CABX54rd3OL=awe2=oEA6Kp=8Duc0rdg5NfDKk_FXuY2UYbx6vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:52:15 +0800
From: Tom Paseka <tom@cloudflare.com>
To: Luan Nguyen <luan20176@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
You won't be able to get many choices there. Given its a Hutchison
building, thought about Hutchison?
You'll need a local loop otherwise, coverage is probably not easy too and
being a hutch building, you wont get much choice.
Other recommendations (if you forget about local loop issues), Pacnet,
Telstra/Reach, PCCW, TATA, NTT, etc.
Every provider should be able to meet your DDOS requirements.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Luan Nguyen <luan20176@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Any recommendation for a 1 Gig Transit provider at Hutchison Cavendish
> Centre? Has to be able to black hole DDOS attack using BGP communities.
> Preferable: Tier 1 provider with US present (IAD would be best)
> HK NSP mailing list doesn't exist anymore?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> -lmn
>
