[161039] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Feb 22 22:03:26 2013
In-Reply-To: <20130222230805.GA5475@gsp.org>
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:02:53 -0500
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>,nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Yrs, but he wanted the retronym for domain names not containing one, not the dot.
Absolute and relative domain names, as Joe and 1035 said.
Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:19:03PM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
>> It's a convention common enough and useful enough that I can see why
>> people would want a handy term for it.
>
>How about "stopdot"? Seems to cover the function and the form.
>
>---rsk
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
