[160971] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Shein)
Wed Feb 20 20:50:56 2013
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:48:19 -0500
To: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean@secdisk.net>
In-Reply-To: <1587878806.245116.1361347855913.JavaMail.sas1@[172.29.251.236]>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Failure to understand reality is not reality's fault.
On February 20, 2013 at 09:10 calin.chiorean@secdisk.net (calin.chiorean) wrote:
>
> If I didn't miss any part of the report, no *nix is mentioned.
>
> I'm a *nix fan, but why they (when I say they, I mean an attacker, not necessary the one in this document) should complicate their life, when all tools are available for windows os, you just have to compile them.
>
> Cheers,
> Calin
>
>
> ---- On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:02:35 +0100 Scott Weeks wrote ----
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Be sure to read the source:
> >
> >intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf
> >
> >I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that
> >only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I
> >haven't gotten far enough through report to find the part
> >where they use the *nix boxes?
> >
> >scott
> >
> >
>
--
-Barry Shein
The World | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
