[160929] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Weeks)
Wed Feb 20 03:47:43 2013
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:45:44 -0800
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- calin.chiorean@secdisk.net wrote:
From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean@secdisk.net>
IMO, if we stick to the document and they are organized in military
style, then a person who collect information, should focus only on
that particular phase. That person is an operator, he or she should
not be keep busy remembering long CLI commands. The scope is to
deliver ASAP.
-----------------------------------------
What's that randy says? >;-) I can only hope you're right, but my
point was to bring suspicion to the report itself for (possibly; I'm
only on page 19) saying that m$ is the only attacking OS.
--------------------------------------
No matter how much I like CLI and to put my fingers into text mode,
I have to admit that point and click in windows is an easier and
faster method to achieve the task I did mention. As Warren mention,
---------------------------------------
bzzzzzt. Wrong answer. Please study more. Next!
scott
