[160859] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Feb 15 20:15:36 2013

From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <FFAA1522-0117-43F9-9A87-F5C6B8CF608A@freethought-internet.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:10:55 -0800
To: Edward Dore <edward.dore@freethought-internet.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

>=20
> With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of =
layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both shared =
mediums aggregated before the exchange.
>=20

Which is a classic example of why I say the L1 provider must not be =
allowed to participate in or act as a related party to the L2+ =
providers.

Owen



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post