[160833] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Suggestions for managed DNS provider?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_de_Tassis_F)
Thu Feb 14 16:18:52 2013
In-Reply-To: <FC23F654D827394488D9056911C9814DDC2B87@SWAIIDE014.ailocal.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_de_Tassis_Filho?= <ctassisf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:00:52 -0200
To: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi David,
I don't know "what exactly 'managed DNS' is" too, but Amazon
Route53<http://aws.amazon.com/route53/>is very reliable (but not cost
effective) AFAIK. Rackspace also have "Free
Cloud-Based DNS Management <http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/dns/>", but I've
never used it. You can find more information about "Free Secondary
DNS" here<http://www.frankb.us/dns/>
.
C=E9sar
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jeffrey Negro <jnegro@advance.net> wrote:
> Hi David - We use DynDNS at my company, and we're very happy with it.
> I've also used DNSMadeEasy at previous companies and found them to be ro=
ck
> solid and very affordable. I think about two years or so ago, they
> survived a full on botnet DDoS attack with no service outage - which my
> monitoring at the time confirmed as well.
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> --Jeffrey
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, David Hubbard <
> dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
> > Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
> > Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
> > alternatives. Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack
> > is better.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------
> This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the person(s)
> or company named and may contain confidential and/or legally
> privileged information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of
> this information may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the
> sender.
>
>