[160825] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Suggestions for managed DNS provider?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey Negro)
Thu Feb 14 15:51:56 2013
From: Jeffrey Negro <jnegro@advance.net>
To: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:29:38 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k17NwRyP_ivPbMMDZnZ1i3mqHesKJps+4GZmaKp84HxQg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi David - We use DynDNS at my company, and we're very happy with it=2E I'=
ve also used DNSMadeEasy at previous companies and found them to be rock so=
lid and very affordable=2E I think about two years or so ago, they survive=
d a full on botnet DDoS attack with no service outage - which my monitoring=
at the time confirmed as well=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AHope that helps!=0D=0A=0D=0A--=
Jeffrey=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AOn Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, David Hubbard <dh=
ubbard@dino=2Ehostasaurus=2Ecom> wrote:=0D=0A> Hi all, anyone have suggesti=
ons for very stable/reliable managed DNS?=0D=0A> Neustar/UltraDNS is an obv=
ious option to look at, just curious about =0D=0A> alternatives=2E Cost ef=
fective would be nice, but stable under attack =0D=0A> is better=2E=0D=0A--=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------=0D=0AThis e-mail, including attachments, is intended fo=
r the person(s)=0D=0Aor company named and may contain confidential and/or l=
egally=0D=0Aprivileged information=2E Unauthorized disclosure, copying or u=
se of=0D=0Athis information may be unlawful and is prohibited=2E If you are=
not=0D=0Athe intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the=
=0D=0Asender=2E
