[160672] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Any experience with Grandstream VoIP equipment ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Blake Dunlap)
Mon Feb 11 09:38:37 2013
In-Reply-To: <C12CA40900F4E0448A2D4E66DFA6A59B17ECCE5328@Demekin.FSI.local>
From: Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:38:05 -0600
To: Nathan Anderson <nathana@fsr.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>,
Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@amorsen.dk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
As another reference point, I really liked the sipura atas, they were my
personal favorite as far as the gear we used. I don't know how well that
translates to after the linksys takeover though, as I haven't done voice
gear in a few years.
-Blake
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Nathan Anderson <nathana@fsr.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:34 PM, Benny Amorsen <mailto:
> benny+usenet@amorsen.dk> wrote:
>
> > They are not perfect, but they are pretty good.
>
> Have you played around with the T.38 support on the SPA-1XX line?
> Historically, it has been difficult to find a reasonably-priced,
> bare-bones (1 FXS, no built-in router) ATA that also happens to do T.38
> well. PAP2T had no T.38 support at all.
>
> SPA-112 price looks good, so I'm wondering what the catch is.
>
> --
> Nathan Anderson
> First Step Internet, LLC
> nathana@fsr.com
>
>
