[160650] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

JoeJobbed, I think

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Sun Feb 10 20:43:42 2013

Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <19407826.5695.1360546806432.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Here are the relevant headers as I saw them from the list:

"""
Received: from benjamin.baylink.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (benjamin.baylink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Rv7Ib4bfEtWx for <jra@baylink.com>;
	Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:55:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sc1.nanog.org (sc1.nanog.org [50.31.151.68])
	by benjamin.baylink.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280D91F0012A
	for <jra@baylink.com>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:55:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=sc1.nanog.org)
	by sc1.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>)
	id 1U4hg5-0007zX-6D; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:55:25 +0000
Received: from smtp.mnginteractive.com ([63.147.64.243])
 by sc1.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <jra@baylink.com>) id 1U4hfD-00074r-27
 for nanog@nanog.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:54:31 +0000
Date: 10 Feb 2013 18:02:46 -0700
X-SBRS: None
X-HAT: Message received through Sender Group RELAYLIST,
 Policy $RELAYED applied.
Received: from atglive19.medianewsgroup.com ([10.148.16.99])
 by smtp.mnginteractive.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2013 18:02:46 -0700
Message-ID: <31513948.1360544065374.JavaMail.atgservice@atglive19.medianewsgroup.com>
"""

Unless I'm very much mistaken, I believe that last Received before the date 
(combined with absence of the static IP of my mailserver) is evidence of an 
envelope-level forgery.

If whomever is babysitting the list this quarter pings me direct, I'll
give them that static (assuming they can't already see it themselves),
and they can double check, but it doesn't look like it came through my 
server; no appearances of nanog.org in my lots between 1720 and 1855EDT.

I note also that I can't see a message body either in the copies I got 
from the list, or the ones I was forwarded.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post