[160562] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (fredrik danerklint)
Fri Feb 8 11:04:20 2013
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:03:52 +0100
From: fredrik danerklint <fredan-nanog@fredan.se>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <51151D3A.9060206@massar.ch>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> You really think people did not have problems with the 1mbit links they
> had back then?
Yes, I do.
> And you really think that we won't have problems with
> Zillion-HD or whatever they will call it in another 20 years?
I think that this is something I'm trying to say, with the creation of
this thread.
>> That works if you are only distributing Video on Demands content.
> Thus the question becomes, for what would it not work?
>> If you also want, for example, to have the possibility to distribute
>> software, (static content as well), can you do that with Fussycast?
As I asked; Static content, like in files (*.zip, *.tar.gz, *.iso, etc...)
> Read the documents and other related literature on that site a little
> bit further: you can overcome those first couple of seconds by fetching
> those 'quickly' using unicast.
Since you are back to the Unicast thing, and as you sad the problem
with the 1 Mbit/s links, I do think your question whould be:
How could we put the cache servers right next to our DSLAM:s,
aggregation switches (or what ever you want to place them in your
network) and have everything that's static content, cached?
I do have an suggestion for how to solve this. See my message yesterday
to the mailing list.
--
//fredan
