[16034] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: oh, for goodness' sake.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Wed Apr 8 20:00:15 1998

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 18:49:27 -0500
From: Karl Denninger  <karl@mcs.net>
To: Stephen Sprunk <sprunk@paranet.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <352BED3B.9C3E00BA@paranet.com>; from Stephen Sprunk on Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 06:33:47PM -0300

Well, my point, really, was that generating filter lists and *loading them*
while relying on things in the network which aren't reliable enough is
rather silly.

IF you're going to run an automated procedure with the *expectation* that
these operations (like a DNS lookup) won't fail, then you had better have
mil-grade reliability.

The *REAL* solution is <DON'T DO THAT>.  I find it insane that folks were
auto-generating filter lists off RIPE's information, using DNS lookups,
without enough error checking to handle the case where the domain doesn't
resolve!

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
			     | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost

On Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 06:33:47PM -0300, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> What would be the utility of doing that?  Shouldn't we first direct
> effort towards making the ROOT servers that reliable?  And then there's
> always the networks used to *reach* these servers, which are often of
> questionable reliability, especially when a MAE is involved.
> 
> Then again, that assumes that routers need military-grade DNS
> capability, which is an absurd concept to begin with.  The routers
> should simply continue to operate normally (or slightly degraded) if DNS
> isn't available.  Any other design is doomed to horrible race
> conditions.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> Karl Denninger wrote:
> > 
> > However, the nameserver infrastructure for such a TLD needs to go *far*
> > beyond *any* existing TLD's nameserver infrastructure.  You're talking here
> > about things that need near, or even at, military-grade reliability levels
> > of service.
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Stephen Sprunk      "Oops."                 Email: sprunk@paranet.com
> Sprint Paranet        -Albert Einstein      ICBM:  33.00151N 96.82326W

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post