[160310] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: muni L1 example (WAS: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Osmon)
Sun Feb 3 17:18:14 2013

Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:11:45 -0700
From: John Osmon <josmon@rigozsaurus.com>
To: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrdfRzcWXD36erM6QBpLRCG9U66ugwm6HgORgNxrR70Yv=-Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Thanks Scott.  Even if you can't name names, having those points stored 
somewhere searchable is going to help someone build a useful case when
deciding to deploy or not.

 
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:55:41PM -0500, Scott Helms wrote:
>    On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:38 PM, John Osmon <[1]josmon@rigozsaurus.com>
>    wrote:
> 
>      Scott -- you've brought up *great* info for this thread.  We all know
>      that city/county/state/federal governments sometimes throw money away on
>      boondoggles (as fiber could become).  You've been able to pull from your
>      direct experience to show how this is true.
> 
>      I threw in Idaho Falls because I'm betting it will help someone doing
>      research in the future.  Can you throw out some of the positive
>      examples you've run across?
> 
>    Jason^h^h^h^hohn, the best cases I've seen were all those scenarios where if the muni
>    didn't build the access it simply wouldn't happen.  I've seen lots of
>    different kinds of technologies used ranging from wireless (not 802.11),
>    to DOCSIS cable (this is actually the most common in the US), and fiber.
>     I can't share my customer's names unfortunately, but the successful ones
>    all shared several things in common:
>    1)  They had specific goals and built the network to reach those goals.
>     In all the "good" situations the networks at least pay for themselves and
>    in some places make a small profit.
>    2)  They have personnel dedicated to their broadband offering that are
>    motivated to make it succeed and the city listens to the technical and
>    operational recommendations of that staff.
>    3)  They focus on a relatively small number of products, generally either
>    just L3 services or L3 services and broadcast video (especially for DOCSIS
>    systems).
>    4)  They get their pricing "right".  This last point is perhaps the most
>    important but hardest to do well.
> 
>    --
>    Scott Helms
>    Vice President of Technology
>    ZCorum
>    (678) 507-5000
>    --------------------------------
>    [2]http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
>    --------------------------------
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. mailto:josmon@rigozsaurus.com
>    2. http://twitter.com/kscotthelms


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post