[160300] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Sun Feb 3 16:46:53 2013
To: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:40:13 CDT."
<CAMrdfRw6B3+sPovj3W0xnVqkxgSe6ZB5hgLiCqX4kGzxpE7ytA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:45:53 +1100
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <CAMrdfRw6B3+sPovj3W0xnVqkxgSe6ZB5hgLiCqX4kGzxpE7ytA@mail.gmail.com>
, Scott Helms writes:
> I answered (I think) your other points in the last email I wrote, but I
> > wanted to address these specifically.
> >
> > I believe that Sweden operates largely on this model and that the Australia
> > NBN project does as well.
> >
> > I would say that the Swedish model is a definite success.
> >
>
> Australia's NBN is still the planning and arguing phase.
They may still be arguing, but there are fiber and fixed wireless
customers receiving packets.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
