[160188] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Feb 1 18:57:55 2013
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:57:31 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <201302010036.AAA08295@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brandon Butterworth" <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
> 3. no home run fibres means no competitors running their own
> GPON or Ethernet. Why invest in making it easier for the
> competition
Because I don't have any competitors; I *am the municipality*.
All the possible competitors *are my customers*, at what amounts to a
tarriffed rate, whether for L1, or (more expensively) L2, assuming my
L2 limitations are acceptable to them.
My goal is to do the trenching once, and never again.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
