[160165] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Ddos mitigation service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joseph Chin)
Fri Feb  1 11:28:32 2013
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see
 http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse
 reporting information)
From: "Joseph Chin" <l-nanog@iodi.se>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <510BE3EA.1010009@nimblesec.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:28:15 -0000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
From my personal experience, I am a fan of pure-play DDoS mitigation service
providers (e.g. Prolexic, Dosarrest) because they are the least likely to
give up on you when things get real difficult. Read the SLA careful to make
sure it is fit for your purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Thomas [mailto:jim@nimblesec.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:49 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Ddos mitigation service
Hi Pierre,
Thank you for your interesting note.
On 01/02/2013 09:57, Pierre Lamy wrote:
> The 3 major scrubbing vendors:
> 
> Prolexic
> Verisign
> Akamai
IIRC, CloudFlare claims to the same capcity of DDOS mitigation as Prolexic
(500gb) and also has a free option with fewer scrubbing features.  Do you
have experience with it, or is there some other reason to have excluded it
from your list?  I apologize for my noobish question.
Cheers,
James