[160135] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brzozowski, John)
Thu Jan 31 16:29:54 2013
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:18:25 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CD2F44E1.1EF37A%nanog-request@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is news, it would be great if more details were available. Anyone?
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
m) +1-609-377-6594
e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
o) +1-484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-----Original Message-----
From: "nanog-request@nanog.org" <nanog-request@nanog.org>
Reply-To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:20 PM
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:16:40 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
>To: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: "Programmers can't get IPv6 thus that is why they do not
> have IPv6 in their applications"....
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301302210440.4289@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=3DUS-ASCII; format=3Dflowed
>
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
>
>>Comcast removed the "no IPv6" excuse? That removal somehow skipped my
>>house in Washington DC where they installed (last October) a router
>>which does not even support it (an Arrus voice gateway- the one where
>>you can't turn of the crummy 2.4g wireless radio) and none of the
>>folks I've spoken to on the phone can tell me when or if it will be
>>coming.
>
>I know Verizon is rolling out v6 in some areas of their FiOS footprint.
>The router they provided supports it, but what I got from their customer
>service people was that they ran into some sort of issue with their TV
>set-top boxes working properly with IPv6 or at least in a dual-stack
>environment. At least that's where things stand in Pittsburgh.
>
>I don't think they've provided training to their customer service people
>on IPv6 yet. The rep I spoke with a few weeks ago told me I was the first
>customer that has asked her about it.
>
>Looking forward to native v6 / dual-stack here...
>
>jms
>
