[160101] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Jan 31 09:10:49 2013

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:10:21 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <BC09E210-03B0-4E15-8982-9247B4DD506D@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message written on Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:30:31PM -0800, Owen DeLong =
wrote:
> > I would like to build an infrastrucutre that could last 50-100 years,
> > like the telephone twisted pair of the last century.  The only tech I
> > can see that can do that is home run single mode fiber to the home.
> > Anything with electronics has no chance of that lifespan.  Anything with
> > splitters and such will be problematic down the road.  Simpler is
> > better.
>=20
> An interesting claim given that the Telco twisted pair you are holding up
> as a shining example did involve electronics, splitters (known as bridge
> taps) etc.

Actually, you're making my point for me.  Telcos have spent billions
removing the electronics, splitters, and bridge taps so they can
have unadulterated copper for higher speed DSL.  To make the new
tech work all of the old tech had to be removed from the plant.

Those things may have seemed cheaper/better at the time, but in the
end I don't think their lifecycle cost was lower.  Private industry
is capital sensitive to a higher degree than government; if a telco
could save $1 of capital cost with a bridge tap, use it for 30
years, and then spend $500 to remove the bridge tap that looked
"better" in their captial model.  I'm suggesting it's better to
spend the $1 up front, and never pay the $500 down the road.

The real win isn't the $500 savings, it's the _opportunity_.
Customers in some parts of the US have waited _years_ for high speed
DSL because of the time it takes to remove bridge taps and otherwise
groom the copper plant.  That's years they are behind other citizens
who aren't on plants with that problem.  Had that junk never been
there in the first place they could have received upgrades much faster.

--=20
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
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=cQ8e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post