[160081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Jan 30 23:00:05 2013
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:59:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGbD49os97bb-Wbex0vRczGKDif3w3WuiADsPjgoehmMh6XKGA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Baugher" <jason@thebaughers.com>
> Calix is producing an Active Ethernet ONT combined with residential
> gateway router. I believe it also supports TR-069 for remote management.
I'll check it out. Thanks. I assume that's TR-TSY-069, a Telcordia
standard?
> One other thing I noticed, most seem to assume a pair of fibers per device.
> Assuming 1G connection, you can easily use bi-directional optics such as we
> use for Active Ethernet and use a single fiber.
Yeah, but the incremental cost of 3-pr drop fiber is likely only to be
maybe 10-15% of the build, and reducing the flexibility is gonna need a
big trade-off for me to buy it; remember, my goal is to allow any prem to
go Layer 1 to wherem ever they want to; they may want both.
(L1 to my other locations, in a ring, and L2 up to a provider from my
hub)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
