[160045] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper MX10 and dual stack BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Wed Jan 30 17:16:20 2013
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:16:00 -0500 (EST)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CALZUErZCd1iRnvJRk_5XKUcWez5KsMAESe2Xq8tnmOHZzNPePQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Christopher Rogers wrote:
> Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series
> running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many BGP
> prefixes it can handle in dual stacked mode. I've got an environment
> currently taking 4 full ipv4 tables and a smattering of prefixes coming
> from a public peering exchange, and I'm curious what will happen if we move
> to dual stack...
I don't have MXs at the border at this point, but I do have a pair of
M120s taking 3 full v4 and v6 BGP feeds, plus a few non-transit peers, and
they're handling the load just fine. Just as a point of reference...
jms
