[160016] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Wed Jan 30 10:40:57 2013
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:40:26 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPYK2_yGE8hkYCsBQYRCc_ZtMOYx=kuA=0RrLcitUL=ZukDAuw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/30/13 6:39 AM, Harald Koch wrote:
> On 30 January 2013 02:39, Jussi Peltola <pelzi@pelzi.net> wrote:
>> High density virtual machine setups can have 100 VMs per host. Each VM
>> has at least a link-local address and a routable address. This is 200
>> groups per port, 9600 per 48 port switch.
> um - let's compare apples to apples here - 100 VMs per host, 9600 per
> 48 port switch, is a problem for IPv4 also...
A trident+ or trident2 switch can't support that, a tor would do
something like 8k arp entries or 4k ndp cache entries, probably less.
