[159971] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eugeniu Patrascu)
Tue Jan 29 17:11:41 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAHDzDLA=9+zPgTRppAkqJt3EmJuCgQNpHg4YcuteCvtm2JD-AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:09:51 +0200
From: Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net>
To: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Mukom Akong T. <mukom.tamon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> I thought about running pure IPv6 inside and do 6to4, but it's too
>> much of a headache,
>
>
> Nice call (skipping 6to4)
>
>>
>> not to mention that not all the internal equipment
>> knows about IPv6 - L2 switches, some terminal servers and so on.
>
>
> Does an L2 switch really care about IPv6? (except for stuff like DHCPv6
> snooping, etc?)
It doesn't, I was talking about management IP addresses (for example
HP2510 only uses IPv4 management addresses).
Eugeniu
