[159967] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Tue Jan 29 16:36:28 2013
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:36:10 +0100
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <mikevs@xs4all.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <12519635.4213.1359489253787.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Cc:
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In article <xs4all.12519635.4213.1359489253787.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com> you write:
>----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doug Barton" <dougb@dougbarton.us>
>
>> > Depends on how big your "deployment" is. For a small office -- say,
>> > 100 PCs or less; something that will fit in what I will catch schidt
>> > for referring to as a "Class C" :-) -- with a single current
>> > generation consumer market edge NAT router, then yes, in fact, you
>> > Just Plug It All In.
>>
>> Well sure, but the same would be true for the equivalent IPv6
>> deployment.
>
>Is that in fact true? My takeaway from watching NANOG the last 8 years
>is that it doesn't always work like that.
That's how it works for all our customers: they plug in the consumer
market edge IPv4 NAT + IPv6 router we send them, and they have IPv4 + IPv6
and often don't even realize it.
Mike.
