[159942] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Tue Jan 29 13:10:32 2013

Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:10:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <51080EAA.8010100@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <brunner@nic-naa.net>

> i'm also indifferent to the "leo-in-the-noc" rationale, as the
> separation is presently somewhat fictive and overzealous prosecutions
> are the norm.

So, you're saying "muni transport is bad because there's *less* separation"
is actually a red herring; private transport carriers are little better
protected?

Yeah, I'll buy that.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post