[159915] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Tue Jan 29 03:37:24 2013
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:37:10 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHDzDLA=9+zPgTRppAkqJt3EmJuCgQNpHg4YcuteCvtm2JD-AA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers Date: Mon, Jan=
28, 2013 at 08:45:39PM +0400 Quoting Mukom Akong T. (mukom.tamon@gmail.com=
):
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net>wro=
te:
>=20
> > I thought about running pure IPv6 inside and do 6to4, but it's too
> > much of a headache,
> Does an L2 switch really care about IPv6? (except for stuff like DHCPv6
> snooping, etc?)
For management it does care. NO ipv4 is NO ipv4. As in not even
management addresses.
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Will the third world war keep "Bosom Buddies" off the air?
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlEHijYACgkQ02/pMZDM1cXE+gCcCbLGDzOKUCVUsfTRYz2IEIoq
zagAnRLlLKU0eVRnrhi/XaKIKFUup7ko
=3P1t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--
