[159890] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Mon Jan 28 03:51:51 2013
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
To: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>, Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:51:36 +0000
In-Reply-To: <50F98AE2.9090001@ttec.com>
Cc: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 18/01/2013 17:48, "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
>Suppose a provider fully deploys v6, they will still need CGN so long as
>they have customers who want to access the v4 internet.
Yes indeed, and the smart folks who thought (clearly didn't!) about how
the best way to manage IPV6 and IPV4 in the access network have made this
really quite difficult. Much more so than it had to be.
