[159847] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is Level(3) AS3356 absorbing GBLX AS3549
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Hoppes)
Thu Jan 24 09:57:56 2013
In-Reply-To: <-2138978155975273853@unknownmsgid>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:57:43 -0600
From: Josh Hoppes <josh.hoppes@gmail.com>
To: "Christopher J. Pilkington" <cjp@0x1.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Yep,
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog56/presentations/Monday/mon.lightning.siegel.pdf
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Christopher J. Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>wrote:
> Overnight BGPmon reports that 3356 was adjacent to our AS, but it is
> not. Only plausible situation I can think of is Level(3) absorbing the
> 3549 GlobalCrossing AS.
>
> Is this going on? Or am I suffering from insufficient caffeination?
>
> -cjp
>
>
